Today my girlfriend told me her man took her shopping at Victoria's Secret to diffuse a situation (and well, to ensure that he was getting some boom boom pow later on...) Now this was all his idea, as it stemmed from a conversation they had in church earlier.
Girl: That's a nice scent I smell (on a fellow churchgoer)
Boy: That's Love Spell from Victoria's Secret, I like that.
Girl: Oh, ok. Smells nice.
So they get to the store and he goes to buy her the stuff and he says to her:
I love the scent of Love Spell. My ex-girlfriend Tia (and my girl's name is Tiya) used to wear this all the time.
The real Tiya got mad. Rightfully so, right? He says, but 1000 other people wear it! That's besides the point. You never tell me that you're buying me something to wear to remind you of your ex-girl. Common sense would tell you that - that's like me saying, "Here, I want you to wear these boxers, babe. They remind me of my ex-boyfriend because he wore them and I loved them on him." I'll be damned if I did.
The thing is, he doesn't get why it's offensive. If he had just bought her the perfume and shut his trap, the whole situation could have been avoided. Less is certainly more in this case.
This is one instance in a continuum of ridiculousless that makes me ask - why do we do what we do? Why do we subject ourselves to the hypocrisy and hysteria of "being in love" only to end up angry about something half of the time?
Mind you, you may think of that as a definition of a "bad relationship" and therefore one you should not be in, but my observation has been that most relationships I hear about or come across are "bad relationships." Two people who are inherently different trying to force a relationship because society gives us this edict that says "this is what you do."
After a bout of introspection, I came to the conclusion that society can get my middle finger. Not because of bitterness from my own personal issues, but because we embrace and endorse this "one size fits all" attitude to love and relationships. We nurture false hope in the forms of fairy tales and romcoms and for those of us who don't fit the mold (or furthermore decide to break it) we get labelled
spinster and other aesthetically unappealling names. In turn, we routinely "pick our battles" and settle for ridiculously subpar relationships in order to avoid being the odd man out.
I broke up with my boyfriend yesterday and did so amicably. Why? Because I refuse to participate in half-assery. I'm not looking for the the chivalrous prince who whisks me off to Nevereverland, but I am interested in the man who thinks I'm the greatest thing sliced bread and is interested in my growth and well-being. If you have that in your relationship,
great - I fully commend and support that, but anything else is absolutely unacceptable. While the feeling of having your partner is one that is nearly unparalleled, I find that I am happiest when I'm alone. I am able to devote myself to my passions
and even obssess over them and I'm provided an excellent return on my investment. In a relationship, I'm Joe Cool when compared to most and I
still spend half my time trying to "work things out" - as many of us do. I find the behaviour to be both counterproductive and asinine, so I'm choosing not to participate.
The problem occurs when we're condemned for not participating. We cannot use the argument that we act the way we do for the sake of procreation, even if there is biological evidence for that theory. We need to stop the dreaming and realize our own self-worth before we embark on the "journey" to fruitlessly cleave onto someone else. Until you're happy on your own, then what the hell is the point?
-emme